Friday, December 9, 2011

The Real Herman Cain Scandal

Ginger White and the other woman who recently made charges against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain have histories of making similar complaints against others that were proven to be false.

The same mainstream media that persecuted Herman Cain said in response to proven charges against Bill Clinton, as a candidate and president, "It's his private life. What he does in private is none of the public's business. Let's move on." Yet they couldn't move on from unproven charges against Herman Cain.

Some people think that because the National Restaurant Association reportedly paid $45,000 to one of its employees against Cain is incriminating.

Most people wouldn't part with $45,000 without serious reason. But that is completely different of an organization in the present litigious environment of the United States. An organization is glad to pay $45,000 instead of possible ruinous costs a jury could impose. 

Ginger White
The real scandal of the case against Cain is that the law allows people to bring forth frivolous lawsuits and impose heavy costs on others at little or no cost to themselves. In other words, legal extortion. 

Because our courts do not currently stick to the letter of the law, people who have zero basis for a lawsuit can create enough uncertainty and fear to extort money from people who cannot afford the risk of going to trial. 

If judges threw frivolous lawsuits out of court instead of letting them go to trial, legal extortion would be nearly nonexistent. And if those who bring charges that do not stand up in court had to pay the other party to the lawsuit for their legal fees and time, these games could not go on. 

ABC News reported that Ginger White, 46, has civil judgments and liens in Georgia and Kentucky against her that go back almost two decades – with 11 filed in 2009 and nine in 2011.

According to news reports, White is an unemployed single mother who's been divorced at least two times, who filed a sexual harassment claim against an employer 10 years ago. That case was settled, according to reports.

White is currently being sued by her former business partner Kimberly Vay, according to news reports, who claims she was stalked and harassed by White and was forced to seek a protective order against her. A court date has been set for January in the matter.

The female bodybuilder, who once ran a bicycle business with Ginger White and won a libel suit against her, says the Atlanta woman never mentioned the Republican presidential candidate, who White says was her lover for 13 years.

According to the lawsuit, which was filed in June 2011, Ginger White and Kimberly Vay were partners in a fitness coaching business called No Limit Cycling, and held classes inside the Martin Luther King Recreation Center, which is owned by the City of Atlanta. In November 2010, claimed Vay, White asked to end their partnership, with White continuing to operate No Limit Cycling, and Vay agreed.

On December 9, according to the complaint, White sent a “defamatory” note to a master email list of the company’s clients and to city officials. The email said that White’s business had “come tumbling down [on] the day I invited Kim Vay into my life and my business” and that Vay had turned her “dream” into a “nightmare.”

According to the complaint, the email alleged that Vay, a competitive bodybuilder, injected veterinary drugs into her system prior to contests,” and also said that Vay preferred to date black men but had made derogatory comments about black women’s hair.

Vay’s complaint termed the allegation about drug use “false, malicious, defamatory” and “reckless,” and therefore libelous.

Both women retained attorneys, according to Vay’s account, and reached an out-of-court settlement in April 2011. In June, Vay filed suit, claiming that White had failed to live up to the settlement and that she was entitled to sue for libel. Vay’s attorney Kurt Martin told ABC News that White had failed to honor the financial agreement that had settled the case.

White has two children and was evicted from her Atlanta home in November. She had several eviction notices in DeKalb County, Ga., over the past six years.

Race played a role in the case against Herman Cain -- a combination of the stereotype that black men can't control their sexual urges and the racist fears of some people of black men having sex with white women -- referring to the allegations by Sharon Bialek -- but Cain's hopes of becoming the 2012 GOP candidate were mainly destroyed by politics.

Sharon Bialek
Bialek has made similar charges of inappropriate behavior, which were proven to be false, against other men as she did with Cain.

Bialek alleges that Cain, while president of the National Restaurant Association, sexually harassed her when she was employed with the organization. The National Restaurant Association settled out of court with Bialek for $45,000.

The persecution of Herman Cain has been mostly driven by the Democratic Party's fear over prominent black conservatives. A prominent black conservative such as Herman Cain is far more dangerous to the Democrats than an equally prominent white conservative.

The 90 percent black vote for Democrats is like money in the bank on Election Day. A self-made man such as Herman Cain , who offers an alternative view of the world is a serious threat politically to liberals and Democrats, because if that alternative view has the effect of reducing the black vote for Democrats, the Democrats would be in big trouble at election time.

To the mainstream media, which is predominantly liberal Democrat, a black conservative must be destroyed -- and character assassination is the fastest way to do it. 

Brian Blackwell

---

Do women ever make false claims about sexual matters? It's more common than you might think. Studies show that false allegations are made about 20-40% of the time, depending on the study. These sorts of false accusations are usually made in order to get attention or money by appearing as an innocent victim, in order to get an alibi for something the woman has done wrong, or to get revenge on someone who has mistreated the woman.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you. Your comment will be reviewed before being posted.